Back in 2018, I was asked to do a radar survey over part of the Roman town of Petuaria. I returned in early 2019 to do a second season of geophysics, in peoples gardens surrounding the site, which unfortunately I cannot show here. I also resurveyed the possible theatre building at a higher resolution, and walking perpendicular to the first survey, which showed a number of changes to the original layout.
Second GPR survey over the possible theatre building
Now in 2020, part of the possible threatre has been excavated by Hull University, with a long trench across the building.
At the north end of the trench, the expected floor surface (G on the plan above) was found, though being gravel, it is likely that the radar was not picking up that surface, but the layer of larger stones below it. Some flat stones and tile had been inserted into the floor for use as a hearth.
Where the stage was supposed to be (feature F on the plan above), there was a layer of rubble, which was found to be a collapsed wall, as underneath that rubble was a layer of wall plaster that had fallen flat and face down. Wall plaster had been found across the site, with multiple colours found, such as red, black, yellow, green, purple and white. It took a long time to carefully remove the wall plaster in an orderly fashion, which didn't finish until the end of the dig.
Further south, things started to get a bot more murky, and controversial. The identification of the building as a theatre was in part down to the seating area, the D shape shown on the GPR results (feature D on the plan above). The feature was found as a straight, wide and thin (depth) wall. It seemed to have facing stones, and rubble core, and additional unmortared areas of flat stones arranged on both sides. It was also very thin, so would not have been any good at holding a ceiling, but would have been good for holding wooden seating. It was in the right position and right angle and right depth, for the feature seen on the GPR, but it was straight rather than curving, as was expected.
That wasn't the only problem. The dating material appearing showed the building was 4th century, but the inscription showing the stage being built was robbed to make part of the military wall in the 2nd century, so the inscription could not have been referring to this building. Unfortunately, as sometimes happens when personal theories are challenged, I got rather defensive about this (sorry guys). The current prevailing interpretation is of a courtyard building, and further work is hopefully planned for next year to continue work in the same trench to hopefully resolve the matter further.
